||[Mar. 14th, 2012|05:53 am]
|||||Golden Palominos: Belfast||]|
We'd gotten a couple of books of Hurrel's Hollywood photos and spent last night dissecting some of them. For a guy who had no light modifiers, only a bunch of bright spot lights he did the most amazing work -- well, we also noticed that apart from lots of pancake makeup, some of his photos had six hours of retouching on them -- but still the amazing effects he got with basically a bunch of snoots boggles my mind.
Years ago I'd read someone say "today you can just get a couple of softboxes and wham! instant great portrait, and it's cheating!" -- and I thought I don't mind cheating so I got a couple of softboxes and did lots of great portraits and only last night did I realize what that person had been talking about -- about it being cheating and it for sure made sense.
Clickenzee to Embiggen!
Add me: [LiveJournal] [Facebook] [Twitter] [Google+] [Tumblr]
2012-03-14 03:02 pm (UTC)
That shot is a very nice example.
Often the "right" place for the model is limited to a half inch or so each direction :-).
I went through a period studying Hurrel a few years back, I should get the books out again and see what I've learned. I've been playing with snoots and modifiers that aren't softeners again for a while, now and then something certainly comes of it.
You can make quite a useful snoot for a "speedlight" with a sheet of white printer paper and a piece of Scotch tape; although it leaks outwards from the sides a lot so it does provide some soft fill. They fold down and pack in the back slash pocket of a camera bag pretty well, too.
Maybe it is cheating, with the softboxes, but trillian_stars
' natural beauty must also make it easy for you to take a great portrait!!
2012-03-14 05:42 pm (UTC)
Well, there's a grid, right? That makes it more directional :-) .
there may be a grid on the hair light. i tried it both ways, can't remember which one this is.
I never had good lights and would shoot with bright ones but would use tricks like covering them with scarves, plastic wrap with vaseline on it it, etc.
There's a very good reason Hurrell didn't use any light-softening modifiers - he was going for something entirely different, something you simply can't get with a soft light. Your portrait, while good, does not tell the same tale...
In other words, it is precisely because the guy used just a couple of spotlights, he could do what he did. Anything beyond fresnel lens, barndoors and a snoot and you're off the hollywood mood :)