now you can get women's jeans with inseam lengths, you just have to know where to find them and which styles actually come with different inseam lengths. the gap has gotten pretty good about having a fairly wide selection of inseam lengths that are now in inches, before they "measured" all of the lengths as ankle, regular, and tall. eddie bauer, calvin klein, eileen fischer, and a few other designers now offer inseams in the same manner as men's pants, which is great when you are shopping with a very tall for age 10 year old and need to try to make shopping as quick as possible.
as for pockets, i am always thrilled to find functional pockets when i buy clothing, and often times will buy several of that item because if the item has great pockets it always seems that the designer will never make that style or change the pockets a few months later. so frustrating.
True, but it's annoying when 'normal' height women can get their work jeans at Wal-Mart for $10 and I have to pay $60 just to get a couple of extra inches.
Also, it's hard to find small sizes in talls, although Chicos is pretty good with their weird sizing in carrying 0 or 1/2 talls.
I guess my worst pet peeve is seeing a sign that says proportioned - petite and average. Grrr.
can't blame you one bit for being annoyed. the proportioned sign bugs me, too. i won't go into my whole rant, but give me a pair made for an hour glass shape, please.
is tall girl still around? there was a shop at the mall of america(i live in the minneapolis/st paul metro area even if my isp says i don't) and i know they had the small sizes in long lengths as the store was for tall women. a friend of mine was thrilled to find them when she came to visit, but i haven't really bothered to see if they are still there(i don't really go there that often). i always forget about chico's. they've changed so much in 20 years i just kind of pass them by.
I think they are, but even if so, they don't carry smaller sizes in talls. I wear a 4-6 (or 7-ish) and that's hell to find in talls. Often 'tall' seems to imply 'big' as well.
I hear you with the hour glass stuff also. It's not usually my problem, but my niece has that trouble. Yes, most women have waists smaller than their hips, thankyou.
not carrying smaller sizes in talls makes no sense. but that might just be me.
the hour glass thing is annoying. i have lost a huge amount of weight- around 200lbs, and even with the apron of loose skin hanging there on my stomach, my waist is much smaller than my hips. i find jeans that fit my hips and they are huge in the waist, fit in the waist and they are super tight in the hips. so annoying. and if there are pockets they are so shallow nothing fits. i have been sticking with one style of gap jeans as they fit well and have lovely deep pockets.
This just flared up my anger at arbitrary numbers assigned to women's clothing as "sizes". It is irritating that I can't walk into a shop and pick out a pair of pants based on waste and inseam in inches. Men's pants are made this way, but I have to try and remember that I can range from a size 7 to a size 13 depending on the clothing company. Is stoooooopid.
No, Tall Girl (as well as Tall Etc) went out of business a few years ago. The number of IRL chain stores that carry clothes specifically for tall women in America is now zero.
Tall Girl got absorbed by Long Tall Sally (a UK company). They have precisely two physical stores in the US (Mall of America and Detroit), and other than that... the only time I get to try on stuff my size is when Long Tall Sally does merchandise tours. I pretty much fell over when I went to Minnesota a while back and got to browse actual racks of stuff likely to fit me.
All I want are long inseams and pockets, is that too much to ask? *sads*
Short women also have problems finding jeans that fit right too! So I feel you.
Petites jeans and other petites clothes tend to be more expensive (although I suppose that is a whole 'nother can of worms, about fast fashion vs. more longer lasting classics that will wear longer... etc. not getting into that now!)
regardless, if you're a shortie under about 5'4" you probably also have a hard time finding nice jeans that fit for less than $50-60 because everything is too long. Not every brand makes "ankle" jeans and those that do - they sell out fast. A few years ago it was a little easier before Low-Rise was super low Ass-crack rise, it's gotten tougher. I know. First world problems. heh.
Well, at least if they are too long you can hem them up.
Too short and there's NOTHING you can do except look like a dork and I did that enough when I was younger and there were no tall sizes.
Nope. You can hem the legs, but the main reason I need petite sizes is the rise - I'm both short and proportionally shortwaisted. This means that regular jeans expect the waist to be somewhere up where my ribs are. That's not something alterations can fix.
WAY easier to hem a pair of pants than to try to somehow make it longer (my solution used to be "buy two identical pairs, cut at the knees of one pair, insert 10 inches of fabric from the knees of the other pair, sew it back together, and now I have ONE pair of pants that fits and a pair of shorts"). WAY easier. Also, I direct your attention to stores such as JC Penney, Sears, Macys, Nordstroms, all of which have "misses" "plus/women" and "petite". I still have yet to see ANY store with an entire section for tall women.
Not to say that petite people don't have trouble finding pants that fit them, but there really is no comparison with the troubles of buying pants for a tall woman, sorry. It's so much easier to make things smaller than bigger.
It's weirdly hard to find large sizes in tall sometimes too... I'm a size 14 (or 16 or whatever the clothing company decides to be... *rolls eyes*) with a damn 40" inseam (happens when you're 6'4"). Places like Gap and Old Navy, while I love them for shirts, don't carry pants long enough for me. Places that do happen to carry a 38" inseam (which works in a pinch) like Alloy or Wranglers only have ultra tall up to size 5. Super lame.
I used to wear mens' pants but even mens' pants don't come up to a 40" inseam, so I'd rather have the more flattering cut of womens' jeans... since I have to pay $100 a pair anyway, they may as well be flattering. Pockets or no pockets >_
Thank you for the list of designers. Finding womens pants w. the inseams in inches locally is difficult for us. I am between petite and regular lengths, reg pants legs are too long but petite are too short.
I always have to hem pants for myself, and for my daughter bc she is a dwarf and Jr pants and jeans come in extra long legs no matter the waist size. Her inseams is 25in and that is w. the legs a bit longer bc she likes them to almost drag the ground.
For many, many years I have always bought more than one of item that fits well and have pockets bc I have also found the next season it will be changed. I have three pairs of basic black pants of the same design and having a med width straight leg, they do not look dated. I avoid the trends of skinny legs or wide legs. I also do this w. tops that are longer than usual so they're not having to be pulled down at the waist when worn, a pet peeve.
no problem. right now the gap outlet near us, so i am not sure if this is true for all of them, has a huge selection of capris, and the inseam on them is 25 inches. i only know this because i keep a little tape measure on me and was figuring out how long they were for my daughter. you might want to check them out.
i also know that dkny have inseam lengths on all of their pants, and some of their skirts even have lengths in the same style so if you are a certain size it does not hit you in a bad/too short spot.